<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gemstone Ends Disney License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/</link>
	<description>Blogging about Disney comics around the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:51:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Disney + Marvel = Darvel &#187; Needcoffee.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-42793</link>
		<dc:creator>Disney + Marvel = Darvel &#187; Needcoffee.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-42793</guid>
		<description>[...] will undoubtedly return to comics following the end of Gemstone publishing the characters. In this article it was stated Disney was &quot;looking for someone else to take the license.&quot; Were they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will undoubtedly return to comics following the end of Gemstone publishing the characters. In this article it was stated Disney was &quot;looking for someone else to take the license.&quot; Were they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peridot Gem</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-42205</link>
		<dc:creator>Peridot Gem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-42205</guid>
		<description>The work of Gemstone’s staff is amazing always.The end of Disney comics in the United States is a sad news but I hope that Disney will soon find another publisher and publish new edition soon.All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The work of Gemstone’s staff is amazing always.The end of Disney comics in the United States is a sad news but I hope that Disney will soon find another publisher and publish new edition soon.All the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collected Edition Blog browsing on Tuesday morning</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37066</link>
		<dc:creator>Collected Edition Blog browsing on Tuesday morning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37066</guid>
		<description>[...] MacDonald, The Beat, picked up a story on the Gemstone troubles from the Disney Comics Worldwide Blog. Looks like no EC Archives for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MacDonald, The Beat, picked up a story on the Gemstone troubles from the Disney Comics Worldwide Blog. Looks like no EC Archives for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statement from Steve Geppi about Gemstone&#8217;s Future &#124; The Disney Comics Blog @ DCW</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37063</link>
		<dc:creator>Statement from Steve Geppi about Gemstone&#8217;s Future &#124; The Disney Comics Blog @ DCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37063</guid>
		<description>[...] days ago I posted that Gemstone ended it&#8217;s Disney license, but it looks like no final decision regarding Gemstone&#8217;s Disney comics has been reached [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] days ago I posted that Gemstone ended it&#8217;s Disney license, but it looks like no final decision regarding Gemstone&#8217;s Disney comics has been reached [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Gemstone lives, but Disney license is up in the air</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37061</link>
		<dc:creator>Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Gemstone lives, but Disney license is up in the air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37061</guid>
		<description>[...] to stories about the financial problems of Gemstone, Diamond Comic Distributors and Geppi. But on Sunday the Disney Comics Worldwide blog passed along this statement from Gary Leach, who has worked on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to stories about the financial problems of Gemstone, Diamond Comic Distributors and Geppi. But on Sunday the Disney Comics Worldwide blog passed along this statement from Gary Leach, who has worked on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; March 31, 2009: Two months and counting</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37059</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; March 31, 2009: Two months and counting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37059</guid>
		<description>[...] a report stating that Disney has decided not to renew their comics license to Gemstone, which if true would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a report stating that Disney has decided not to renew their comics license to Gemstone, which if true would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Grabowski</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37006</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Grabowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37006</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand why the Disney corporation seems hell-bent on selling the continuing adventures of its characters in crappy DVDquels can&#039;t be bothered to get into marketing these comics to its consumers as well.  These should be available at Disney Stores, at the theme parks, at Disneyana conventions, and other places Disney fans go.  The best books are at least as collectible as those *@#% pins they love to make.  They should be promoted on the TV networks and the websites.  There&#039;s a wealth of work-for-hire material that can be reprinted for almost nothing, with European artists busily producing more all the time.  

What&#039;s really frustrating to me is seeing this golden age of classic comic book and newspaper strip reprinting projects go by without any major attempts to re-present the Taliafero Donald Duck strips, Gottfredson&#039;s Mickey Mouse adventures, the gorgeous Silly Symphonies serials, or the classic Dell comics.  Barks is more than adequately covered, and I&#039;m grateful for the handful of recent Gottfredson stories in C&amp;S, but I cling to my quickly-deteriorating Gladstones from the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s for the great stuff they published.

David Gerstein, thanks for all you did for the various publishing efforts over the years.  You produced a precious set of books that I now enjoy sharing with my kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand why the Disney corporation seems hell-bent on selling the continuing adventures of its characters in crappy DVDquels can&#8217;t be bothered to get into marketing these comics to its consumers as well.  These should be available at Disney Stores, at the theme parks, at Disneyana conventions, and other places Disney fans go.  The best books are at least as collectible as those *@#% pins they love to make.  They should be promoted on the TV networks and the websites.  There&#8217;s a wealth of work-for-hire material that can be reprinted for almost nothing, with European artists busily producing more all the time.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s really frustrating to me is seeing this golden age of classic comic book and newspaper strip reprinting projects go by without any major attempts to re-present the Taliafero Donald Duck strips, Gottfredson&#8217;s Mickey Mouse adventures, the gorgeous Silly Symphonies serials, or the classic Dell comics.  Barks is more than adequately covered, and I&#8217;m grateful for the handful of recent Gottfredson stories in C&amp;S, but I cling to my quickly-deteriorating Gladstones from the 80&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s for the great stuff they published.</p>
<p>David Gerstein, thanks for all you did for the various publishing efforts over the years.  You produced a precious set of books that I now enjoy sharing with my kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torsten Adair</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-37000</link>
		<dc:creator>Torsten Adair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-37000</guid>
		<description>Almost every market has been tried by almost every publisher (including Disney) and nothing succeeds.   Boom! seems to be the only active American licensee, producing Muppet and Pixar titles.  Checker is reprinting/collecting CrossGen.  Slave Labor Graphics has tried some original stories with minimal success.  Tokyopop produce Cine-Manga of Disney properties, but never seemed to succeed.  Kingdom Comics might succeed by re-imagining Disney properties.  

The European model was tried, and succeeded as Disney Adventures magazine, spinning off a comics-only magazine.  Gladstone II tried cheaper editions.  Disney tried a mainstream approach, hoping to ride the speculator boom.  Gemstone catered to collectors with trades and to young readers with digests.  Marvel partnered with Gladstone to distribute titles to newsstands, as well as producing movie tie-ins.

The only format not tried?  Black-and-white &quot;phone books&quot;.  Something like Shonen Jump or Essential Spider-Man.  (Hey, if someone will shell out $100 for black-and-white hardcover Barks stories, why not $4.95 for 300 pages of Disney comics &amp; stories &amp; games &amp; ...)

Are the classic characters marketed well in the U.S.?  Do kids see them?  And where are the tie-ins for Goof Troop and House of Mouse?  (Or One Saturday Morning?)

My best to the Gemstone staff.  You produced some excellent stories, and I wish you all well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every market has been tried by almost every publisher (including Disney) and nothing succeeds.   Boom! seems to be the only active American licensee, producing Muppet and Pixar titles.  Checker is reprinting/collecting CrossGen.  Slave Labor Graphics has tried some original stories with minimal success.  Tokyopop produce Cine-Manga of Disney properties, but never seemed to succeed.  Kingdom Comics might succeed by re-imagining Disney properties.  </p>
<p>The European model was tried, and succeeded as Disney Adventures magazine, spinning off a comics-only magazine.  Gladstone II tried cheaper editions.  Disney tried a mainstream approach, hoping to ride the speculator boom.  Gemstone catered to collectors with trades and to young readers with digests.  Marvel partnered with Gladstone to distribute titles to newsstands, as well as producing movie tie-ins.</p>
<p>The only format not tried?  Black-and-white &#8220;phone books&#8221;.  Something like Shonen Jump or Essential Spider-Man.  (Hey, if someone will shell out $100 for black-and-white hardcover Barks stories, why not $4.95 for 300 pages of Disney comics &amp; stories &amp; games &amp; &#8230;)</p>
<p>Are the classic characters marketed well in the U.S.?  Do kids see them?  And where are the tie-ins for Goof Troop and House of Mouse?  (Or One Saturday Morning?)</p>
<p>My best to the Gemstone staff.  You produced some excellent stories, and I wish you all well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerstein</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-36946</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 03:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-36946</guid>
		<description>Jeffcon,

Whatever you thought of the rest of our line, the Neighbor Jones title and 16-page comics were Gladstone II products some twelve years ago—not ours.
As for Gemstone, our $2.95 32-page comics had 30 actual comics pages. Our $2.25 competitors had 20-24 actual comics pages. It shakes out to the same price.

Don&#039;t let me get bogged down in technicalities... I&#039;m as glum as anyone here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffcon,</p>
<p>Whatever you thought of the rest of our line, the Neighbor Jones title and 16-page comics were Gladstone II products some twelve years ago—not ours.<br />
As for Gemstone, our $2.95 32-page comics had 30 actual comics pages. Our $2.25 competitors had 20-24 actual comics pages. It shakes out to the same price.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let me get bogged down in technicalities&#8230; I&#8217;m as glum as anyone here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffConn</title>
		<link>http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/2009/03/gemstone-ends-disney-license/#comment-36912</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffConn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wolfstad.com/dcw/blog/?p=366#comment-36912</guid>
		<description>@Arthur: Gemstone&#039;s approach to the newsstand was disingenuous. They sold to a handful of chain bookstores, but their focus was always the comic book store. Which was natural, since Geppi owns a distributorship for comic book stores.  Why would he give content to the competition? And the comic book store is a slowly dying breed, one reason for that being the Diamond monopoly.

As for the 32 pages for $2.95, these books came out when other kid friendly comics were selling for $1.95 to $2.25. Their only try at truly cheap comics were those horrible 16 page comics with easily ripped covers, one of which focused on Neighbor Jones, for crying out loud. 

As for what the next Disney publisher should try, i would look to the Japanese manga model. Shonen Jump sells for $4.99 for 300 pages of comic content. It&#039;s on cheap paper. Save the glossy crap for the collected editions. Plenty of other content in there too. It&#039;s a good value for the buck, which pleases readers. It&#039;s got a price tag similar to other magazines on the newsstand, which pleases retailers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arthur: Gemstone&#8217;s approach to the newsstand was disingenuous. They sold to a handful of chain bookstores, but their focus was always the comic book store. Which was natural, since Geppi owns a distributorship for comic book stores.  Why would he give content to the competition? And the comic book store is a slowly dying breed, one reason for that being the Diamond monopoly.</p>
<p>As for the 32 pages for $2.95, these books came out when other kid friendly comics were selling for $1.95 to $2.25. Their only try at truly cheap comics were those horrible 16 page comics with easily ripped covers, one of which focused on Neighbor Jones, for crying out loud. </p>
<p>As for what the next Disney publisher should try, i would look to the Japanese manga model. Shonen Jump sells for $4.99 for 300 pages of comic content. It&#8217;s on cheap paper. Save the glossy crap for the collected editions. Plenty of other content in there too. It&#8217;s a good value for the buck, which pleases readers. It&#8217;s got a price tag similar to other magazines on the newsstand, which pleases retailers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
